Doney v The Queen (1990) 171 CLR 207

Facts: Defendant (D) (Doney) was convicted of importing cannabis resin. The prosecution (Pr) case depended on the evidence of an accomplice (Freeman) whose evidence was flawed, not only because it was given by an accomplice but also because he admitted to telling lies at various stages from the time he was first interviewed by police.

Want to read more?

Subscribe to casetreasury.com to keep reading this exclusive post.

Subscribe Now